Short answer: Yes, you should be able to pay for sex. When two consenting people (a prostitute and her client) agree to a trade (money for sex), and that trade doesn’t immediately, directly, or violently affect a third party, they should be free to make that trade. 

By the way, you should also be able to pay for other things:

Longer answer: People do a lot of things I don’t like. For example, when I see people gambling on sports, it makes me feel like they’re tarnishing the games I love. When I see people smoking, it makes me sad, because I know they’re damaging the beautiful, intricate machine that is the human body. 

But I don’t get to impose my personal and subjective view of “right” and “wrong” on other people; especially not through government laws. The truth is, I have enough trouble figuring out what’s right and wrong for myself; I certainly am in no position to do it for other people.

Moreover, biting my tongue on the gambling issue is the price I pay for getting to do peaceful, nonviolent things that other people might not want me to do … like drinking coffee or using electricity, which some people consider immoral or against their religious faith. 

So, yes, you should be able to pay for sex … if a consenting person is willing to sell it. That reminds me of the riddle below, which highlights the importance of consent

What’s the difference between sex and rape? Consent. 

What’s the difference between work and slavery? Consent.

What’s the difference between tax and theft? Magical fairy dust.

Are you a student interested in getting involved in pro-liberty activism? By applying to join Students For Liberty’s Local Coordinator Program, you can be supported in promoting the ideas of liberty while also developing your skills and meeting many like-minded students from across the world. Click on the button below to find out more and get involved!

This piece solely expresses the opinion of the author and not necessarily the organization as a whole. Students For Liberty is committed to facilitating a broad dialogue for liberty, representing a variety of opinions.